Basic Table Component

[Gerard_Fernandez]

Thank u for that!!

Please allow moving rows up and down for reordering the table. Thanks

[Travis]

Amazing! Great option to keep information cleaner.

[eltintero]

Could we have a feature that when the table can be clicked to link to a screen?
Same as we have for the basic text component.

[Mark]

You want the whole table to link to a screen? What’s your use case for this?

[gvalero]

@Antonio …una maravilla!

I like the option #1 (alt 1)

Saludos

Gavp

[eltintero]

@Antonio

Screen Shot 2020-03-25 at 12.11.22 AM2111×1247 581 KB

I think none of the three explorations shown above are technically incorrect. Both colors and font-weights variations achieve the same result of presenting two different sets of informations (columns). But at the end we thought the implementation we picked, was the one that reads the best from a LTR (left-to-right) hierarchy point of view, and it was also more “standard” and aligned with the samples and use cases we found in one of the platforms (iOS).

Yes.
The table shows some basic data, and then when clicking the table, I’d go to a screen for a detailed view of that info.

For example, I’m working right now on this app.

I’d like to go to a detailed view when I click the table.

[Mark]

So you’d want to go to a different detail screen for the same data row?

[eltintero]

yes sir.

[Krivo]

@eltintero

It is similar to the wish as seen in the below link although you would like to go to a detail screen

You could upvote “link to screen actions on list items” in the feature request app and make a remark that is should also be possible for basic table component.

It would be nice it is was possible everywhere where you can jump somewhere else - like you can do on image and button component

@Mark
I don’t know if it a big technical challenge but I would think that is should be easy to do in the builder as a column on a specific row should just be used to point to a specific screen.
Actually in @eltintero case there might have to be send two parameters: 1. screen to go to 2. data to take along

Tiles as links to screens

The flexibility of layout could be enhanced quite a bit if it was possible to make a tile (fx as an inline list) link to a specific screen - just like what is possible with the image and the button component. These can have action = “Link to Screen” Right now you can only have one link horizontally - but allowing tiles to have link to screen would make it easier to create more links on the same line. Somehow the screen to link to should be available as a column in the same row as other informa…

[eltintero]

Exactly. @Krivo took the words out of my mouth.
Couldn’t have said it better.

[kyleheney]

Any chance we can get the ability to rearrange rows in a Basic table?

[sardamit]

I feel the need to say this again: I absolutely love this feature and this has been extremely well-executed.

I have been implementing this for a few of my apps, and the difference in what was available before and after this feature cannot be missed.

[edbs_India]

My UI is different, how do I get the latest ?

[Jeff_Hager]

@edbs_India What is different?

[aor]

@eltintero

The table shows some basic data, and then when clicking the table, I’d go to a screen for a detailed view of that info.

This is nice - I had simple requirement that was met. Thank very much

Here is how i am using:

[david]

Please make a new topic if you have a new question.

[Prevencion_Loiregest]

wow ! Good job. I´ve applied

[Lighted_Candle]

Excellent feature But…
I

noticed that Table component no longer allows access to relational table data. Went missing this morning. Was that intentional? or is it a bug?

[Lucas_Pires]

Hello @Lighted_Candle
I guess you’re trying to pick a single value from a relation, right? Cause the basic table just show a single information. For this you gotta let the Relation as a single one, not checking the Matching multiple option, allowing to pick the information the Relation got for you

[Jeff_Hager]

I think he was talking about actual relations in the basic table. Sounds like it’s been fixed.