My perception of the horizontal scrolling of the tile (Orientation=Horizontal) is that can do something similar to image carousal - but I did’t understand that it was actually possible to scroll horizontally. The image carousal indicates the possibility of horizontal scrolling by showing (1/6). - but the tile layout doesn’t.
I don’t have the perfect idea for indicating “horizontal scroll possibility”
How do you get to scroll Horizontally
Am I missing something?
How do you get tile to scroll Hor
Choose Inline list and then you get the option vertical or horizontal. I just found out myself 
@mrt224 here is a quick screen recording. sorry, no sound. but I hope it is clear, how to use this horizontal tiles layout for inline list- 
Thank you!
Thank u
the ‘indicator’ you looking for the horizontal tile layout would be the ‘peek out’ of other item at the most right side. In term of UI/UX this is actually the standard way on how to tell users that there are more item and user can do horizontal scroll.
@erwblo - i’m on it. Sounds like you’re all working it out ok. Thanks @NataliaGo and everyone else for helping each other out as usual 
Could you please share your app? I can’t reproduce this.
I imagine that the translation will be updated soon for ‘see all’? 
As said by many others already, this is an awesome new feature! I’ve tried this out and found a limitation that I’m not sure is me missing something or maybe an issue that will be addressed in a scheduled update in the near future?
Here’s our use case. In our Active section, we’re cross-referencing records in our Parks section where users can go to enjoy a specific activity. In this example below, where users can go to play basketball:
In this example, I’m using the List style on the left and the Tiles style using the 3:1 shape on the right. Tiles are a great way to display content when the image is the focal point and the best way to convey information to the user. However, in our case, providing users with the name of the park and almost a complete snippet of the address is much more valuable than an image. For some of our references, we need to display 100+ records like in this Parks with Basketball example.
Given this back story, my two specific questions are:
Thanks to everyone in advance for their feedback…I appreciate it.
@david
I appreciate you getting back. To answer your questions:
I attempted to explain this in my post. I want to use the List style instead of Tiles because the display of anything more than a thumbnail image doesn’t add any value for the user and wastes a lot of screen real estate. In my screenshots, you can see the List option allows for 8+ items instead of just 3 using the smallest Tile shape available (3:1). Screen real estate is a big issue for us because some of these inline lists will include 100+ records. Also, in my example, the images in the Tile style dominant the screen (overpower really) and when scrolling makes viewing/picking out the park name and address a little difficult because they’re dwarfed by the image.
When will See All be available for vertical lists?
I don’t want to make Tiles look like Lists; I want the See All functionality available for Lists. I can’t imagine we would be the only ones using Glide who could benefit from this option.
Let me know your thoughts and thanks for your time. 
I understand. I’ve referred to this idea before as a ‘truncated inline list’. How many vertical list items would you like to show inline, before ‘See all’? 5? Is it constant?
@david
10 would be great. There are a few list that will be less than 10 if that’s what you mean by being constant? I assume anything less than 10 wouldn’t display the See All? Thanks for your willingness to consider this!
@david allowing the number of items to be configurable number would end the discussion of what is the right number 
I think the right number “depends” of the use case. Of course a default number should be used.
Being able to define the number as to which ‘See All’ would be ideal.
