Hi Jeff, thanks so much.
I think I cannot, i feel like it will break something else. see the screenshot.
It makes me think i did my relation setup badly - it is not intuitive how the issues relation column is lists some grouped field. i think i asked about that on a prior post here, and i thought someone said that it was ‘ok’ that the relation column looked like that,. It feels strange, and unintuitive to me. i would expect the relation to be at the record level, or at the store location level not the 'retail/corporate ’ level of grouping… this is NOT a distinction for the region_mkt.
should i go back and try and refigure out the division sheet, and relations part of that ?