😱 Now Available: Multiple Selection!

[V88]

Let me check again …

[V88]

Nope. Obviously still “en route” to the UK @Darren_Murphy

[slscustom.ru]

@Darren_Murphy

It seems to be fixed? For both single and multi-select?
Or maybe the bug hasn’t crossed the pacific yet…

No, the bug is still present in Russia

[slscustom.ru]

Of course, I understand everything, diamond, innovation, but this leads to the fact that everything constantly stops working. And now all the components of the choice have disappeared …
Of course, we welcome innovations and development of the platform, but as for example with operating systems, a public beta version with fresh innovations is released, and only when it becomes stable, it is released as the main (production). And now, it turns out we are using a public beta version, which constantly stops working.
This is just a wish that there is a public beta version, for enthusiasts to track down all bugs and a stable version. If this is impossible to implement, then at least, please, inform us about the planned work on updating, so that we do not waste our time figuring out why it stopped working. At this time, we just read the manual.
And nevertheless, thank you for the diamond

[slscustom.ru]

@slscustom.ru

And now all the components of the choice have disappeared …

The choice are back, but the behavior of single-choice is still like that of multiple-chioce

[Simon_Hill]

Prayers have been answered. Thank you Glide!!

[Simon_Hill]

Hey Bob,

Is there a workaround that let’s the user keep adding names to the main array of ID’s;

1. Follow as normal by selecting from a sub-list of ID’s not already in the array (or not yet followed)
2. Un-Follow by selecting from a sub-list of ID’s already in the array (and must be followed)

Then, if the ‘occurrence sum’ is odd then the person is followed, if not the person is unfollowed.

[Robert_Petitto]

I have an idea…I’ll test it out later today and get back to you.

[L.M]

poor lonesome tiny bug, rejected from everywhere! It must struggle with its frequent flyer’s voucher , unless it’s a hell of a swimmer! or it missed it’s clandestine lift on an Amazon shipping drone

[Robert_Petitto]

@Robert_Petitto

I have an idea…I’ll test it out later today and get back to you.

My test didn’t work—I was hoping that multiselect would still work if items were filtered out. I think it’s a bug.

What I want:

1. Choice component with multiselect turned on, filtered to one item (user specific filter applied, so each user will see different filtered items in the list—BUT it writes to a column that everyuser can access)
2. Selecting that item adds/removes ONLY THAT VALUE from the Comma Separated List

What’s happening:

• Selecting that filtered item in the choice component removes all previously selected items and replaces the column value with that one filtered item.

@jason @mark

[Mark]

Good point.