Latest updates to Glide’s plans and pricing ✨

[NoCodeAndy]

@Evgeny1

What of Glide Tables API and/or integrating it with Make?

Adding to @rwdaigle’s comment… stay tuned. Check out our preview in the meantime.

@bman737

I really don’t understand the reasoning behind separating public and private users in the first place.

Public vs private users in legacy apps, and users vs personal users in the new apps, are all trying to address the same problem: how do we efficiently serve multiple use cases?

Companies running their internal operations on Glide aren’t the same as indiehackers building MVPs or nonprofit groups building apps for their members. They’re all very different.

I agree that what we have today isn’t perfect, but that’s why we keep tweaking, and keep going back to the community with these updates and inviting more feedback/comments.

@todd.y

The Glide team should consider doing some customer focus groups instead of just shooting from the hip on all these changes.

@David_Gabler

I don’t think Glide is amenable to ‘customer focus groups’. They are letting their investors and their new vision of internal-facing Apps drive their pricing. They are being clear on that point.

We’re iterating on the prices because we talk to customers.

They’re not necessarily posting on the forum, but you’re right: these customers are companies building internal-facing apps, and their needs drive a lot of our development.

We have the Free and Maker plan for other projects. If those still aren’t a fit for what you need, there are plenty of other platforms out there that might be a better choice.

@David_Gabler

I am also disappointed they gave up on the promise of providing a tool that could take most of the grunt work out of converting Classic Apps to Apps. Even a 90% conversion would have been super helpful.

This work is still happening, but the scope of it, and the complexities of it, are significant. In the meantime we’re recommending folks rebuild if the wait is too much.