Instability in User's table

Title: Users table only works reliably for my own row — tester rows fail to hydrate/populate consistently across app

I’m building a fairly large Glide app (“Commuter Eye”) with realtime-style operational systems including:

  • Live Updates (alerts)
  • Tunnel Talk (discussion threads)
  • Replies
  • Favorites
  • Arrivals
  • GPS/location logic
  • Route/session state

I’ve narrowed a large number of instability issues down to what appears to be a deeper Users table / user hydration issue.

The strange part is:

MY row in the Users table works correctly and populates many computed/user-specific columns normally, while tester rows do not populate the same columns consistently (or at all).

Examples of columns that work for MY row but not reliably for testers:

  • Viewing Incident ID
  • Viewing Cluster Row ID
  • Selected Route ID
  • Nearest Stations
  • User Location Coordinates
  • Arrivals Web Embed URL
  • Incident Count
  • Favorite Routes Relation
  • Draft Route/Alert state
  • Push Alerts Enabled
  • Editing Profile
  • Various relations/lookups tied to user state

Symptoms across the app:

  • Replies appear on device but not in Glide editor
  • Glide editor shows replies that don’t appear on tester devices
  • User profile editing inconsistently appears
  • Avatars/names fail to hydrate consistently
  • Arrivals previously became unstable until I removed Users dependency entirely
  • Relations work for my row but not for testers
  • User-specific state appears partially initialized for testers

Important observations:

  • Authentication itself appears to work
  • Tester rows DO exist in Users
  • My row behaves normally across all systems
  • Many failures disappear when operational systems stop depending on Users
  • Relations and realtime-style flows become stable when I use direct row IDs/screen values instead of User Profile values

This makes me think there is some hidden issue with:

  • user row hydration
  • delayed user-specific initialization
  • row ownership
  • user-specific columns
  • how Glide resolves tester sessions vs editor “Viewing As”
  • or a corrupted/misaligned Users structure

Questions:

  1. Has anyone seen a situation where the owner/developer row hydrates correctly but tester rows do not?
  2. Is there a known Glide limitation with large numbers of user-specific columns?
  3. Could certain user-specific relations/lookups silently fail for non-owner users?
  4. Is there a known “best practice” for separating operational systems from Users-dependent systems in Glide?
  5. Has anyone successfully stabilized a large multi-user Glide app heavily using user-specific columns/relations?

I’ve attached screenshots of the Users table and several of the affected columns.

At this point I’m trying to determine whether:

  • the Users architecture itself needs restructuring,
  • there is a hidden configuration issue,
  • or Glide’s user-specific hydration model simply becomes fragile at scale.

Any deep technical insight would be appreciated.

Sounds like something is fundamentally wrong with your setup. You mentioned some screen shots, but didn’t share them. These would be helpful.

  • A screen shot of your Users table showing column headings and a few rows of data (redact where necessary)
  • A screen shot of your User Profiles configuration.
  • One very specific example of something that isn’t working as you expect it to

Also, your repeated use of the term “hydration” is confusing. What do you actually mean by this?

I don’t understand that question.

No.

If rows are unowned, then those rows will not exist on a users device. So, yes.

If I understand the question correctly, then yes - Row Owners and Roles as Row Owners.

Yes. How many do you consider a large number?
The fact that you’re asking this question make me wonder if you might be mis-applying User Specific columns. Can you descriobe (or show) how you are using them and for what purpose?

I think I may have identified the core issue.

My app currently has a Users table and authentication enabled, but there does not appear to be any explicit Users/Profile binding configuration layer in the current Glide UI beyond Access/User Data.

The app seems to be implicitly inferring Users-table resolution instead of me explicitly configuring:

  • Users table
  • identifier column
  • row binding
  • profile mapping

Could this explain why:

  • my owner/editor row consistently initializes and populates user-specific/runtime columns,
  • while tester rows only partially populate or fail to initialize the same operational state?

At this point it feels less like a relation issue and more like the app owner session is receiving privileged/internal user resolution while tester sessions are not fully binding to Users rows consistently.



Review the below: