Sorry to object this: “But at no time would I ever assume that I know more about the priorities of a company better than they ever would.”.
Company priorities can be desasterously wrong! I am not speaking about glide. I am speaking generally. As an evidence by example, take Kodak: they invented digital camera, but the priority of the company was conventional photography. This is the reason why they went Chapter 11 few years later!
I don’t want that glide experiences same destiny, because “they know their priorities best!”. Their priorities are NOT relevant. Relevant are the priorities of their users/customers.
Let’s take another example: " Use Multiple Choice Components to Filter an Inline List "
Thanks to @Robert_Petitto fascinating expertise I mastered this. But if I want to do it once more, I have to repeat whole process from scratch. And the proces consists out of 24 (twentyfour) steps in glide. Just tell me, who will do this exercise within the product labeled “no-code”. This can do only a programmer, but he/she will say: “No way! For me it is easier to code that and store in the form of reusable function/script/subroutine!”.
I am 100 % with you that glide is super. But I am strongly suggesting that they should listen to the voice of their users. Here in the community I want to see accepted user requests on the development timeline.
Back to your original statement: do not forget or underestimate “collective intelligence”. Its quotient is always by the order of magnitude higher than the quotient of “company intelligence”! 