no, itâs the same as before
Is your container setting 1:1? The Glide divider line is very subtle, often not readable.
Itâs set on âFullâ but i also tried 1:1 just in case
Iâll double-check. Trying to publish it. Iâll let you know later.
ok
@Sekayi_Liburd, This is a code improvement that can be responsive for two views: mobile and desktop (you can temporarily disable the use of device info). Please try again.
If it still doesnât work, try taking a screenshot of the left and right panel configurations in full so I can see them clearly.
Note: USE THE PREVIOUS CODE ![]()
View on iPhone
Desktop view
No, the container containing the collection and richtext is the header, you should place it first at the very top.
Try changing the container background to accent.
Each different setting results in a different selector. Will you keep this condition, or will you revert to ânoneâ?
hmm⌠I prefer the accent than none. But I prefer a background image than the accent. So Iâll have to play around with it to see what I land on.
(All the codes work now btw
)
Thanks for your saintly patience.
I have a question for you.
Can I create a sequence of actions that also sync with the Index to Show column?
A.k.a:
When Index to Show is 1 â action 1
When Index to Show is 2 â action 2
etc.
I feel like we should be able to get the images and actions to sync up even if we donât use a collection but I donât really know how to build action sequences yet.
If we can use the image component or just rich text, weâll be able to create/customize a design that we love.
You can assemble that condition in a ânew actionâ for the collection regarding the current row/image displayed. However, if youâre using the image or richtext component, they are static and I donât think itâs possible.
Can you explain what âstaticâ means in this case? If we capture the moment the user taps on the image by identifying the âIndex to Showâ when the action is triggered, wouldnât it resemble something live? (Similar to how our custom search works)
The relationship of these components with the table is only through one data column from the backend table. Although it can contain an array, but it does not have a direct relationship. You wonât find a relation from the option of this object.
hmm⌠ok. That might be why Iâve been going in circles trying to set up the actions. ![]()












