no, it’s the same as before
Is your container setting 1:1? The Glide divider line is very subtle, often not readable.
It’s set on “Full” but i also tried 1:1 just in case
I’ll double-check. Trying to publish it. I’ll let you know later.
ok
@Sekayi_Liburd, This is a code improvement that can be responsive for two views: mobile and desktop (you can temporarily disable the use of device info). Please try again.
If it still doesn’t work, try taking a screenshot of the left and right panel configurations in full so I can see them clearly.
Note: USE THE PREVIOUS CODE ![]()
View on iPhone
Desktop view
No, the container containing the collection and richtext is the header, you should place it first at the very top.
Try changing the container background to accent.
Each different setting results in a different selector. Will you keep this condition, or will you revert to “none”?
hmm… I prefer the accent than none. But I prefer a background image than the accent. So I’ll have to play around with it to see what I land on.
(All the codes work now btw
)
Thanks for your saintly patience.
I have a question for you.
Can I create a sequence of actions that also sync with the Index to Show column?
A.k.a:
When Index to Show is 1 → action 1
When Index to Show is 2 → action 2
etc.
I feel like we should be able to get the images and actions to sync up even if we don’t use a collection but I don’t really know how to build action sequences yet.
If we can use the image component or just rich text, we’ll be able to create/customize a design that we love.
You can assemble that condition in a “new action” for the collection regarding the current row/image displayed. However, if you’re using the image or richtext component, they are static and I don’t think it’s possible.
Can you explain what “static” means in this case? If we capture the moment the user taps on the image by identifying the “Index to Show” when the action is triggered, wouldn’t it resemble something live? (Similar to how our custom search works)
The relationship of these components with the table is only through one data column from the backend table. Although it can contain an array, but it does not have a direct relationship. You won’t find a relation from the option of this object.
hmm… ok. That might be why I’ve been going in circles trying to set up the actions. ![]()












