Glide API usage

[Adam_Crossley]

@ThinhDinh

“Their” table is still costing them money

I am certain of this…

@ThinhDinh

There are still calls to be made.

I’m also certain of this!

@ThinhDinh

if you do a lot of updates that would still cost them money.

Without a shadow of a doubt.

As far as I can see, nothing is given. This is all I could find to go off:

Sheet Edits Quota—1000 per month?

Most apps will not be affected by this and we will have some exciting updates about data soon… Apps that reload too often can cost us as much or more than a Pro subscription. We’re working on another data source that’s less expensive for us than reading from your Google Sheet, which is our major cost.

I’ve had to make a set of assumptions. One is that the Glide Tables are the less expensive alternative to Google Sheet, which is the major cost to Glide.

@ThinhDinh

I believe their old pricing structure doesn’t reflect well what cost them most

I was able to make this assumption when I discovered the disclosure about GS updates costing them more than a Pro subscription. My concern I suppose is regarding how drastic the change in quota appears to be given the evident reduction in cost.

I guess at this point in the conversation I still don’t understand it. So many questions come out of it.

1. Is add/edit/delete via the API the same cost as it is doing it directly in the table?
2. Is the cost of an update via Glide API to the Glide Table the same cost as an update to GS?
3. Are the methods above distinguished in the quota? E.G. API counts against quota, and direct in the table doesn’t count against quota?
4. If Glide Tables are supposed to be the data source that is less expensive than GS why are users receiving significantly fewer updates/edits?

@ThinhDinh

It allows 500, not 5000.

This is awkward… Not sure what to make of it.