# Expand Glide’s Resource & Integration Layer for Larger Companies (or at least don't price segment on resources)

**URL:** https://community.glideapps.com/t/expand-glide-s-resource-integration-layer-for-larger-companies-or-at-least-dont-price-segment-on-resources/80233
**Category:** Feature Requests
**Created:** [February 21, 2025, 7:52pm UTC](https://community.glideapps.com/t/expand-glide-s-resource-integration-layer-for-larger-companies-or-at-least-dont-price-segment-on-resources/80233 "2025-02-21T19:52:08Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![tools-dev](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/community.glideapps.com/tools-dev/32/85456_2.png) [@tools-dev](https://community.glideapps.com/u/tools-dev)
#### Post date: [February 21, 2025, 7:52pm UTC](https://community.glideapps.com/t/expand-glide-s-resource-integration-layer-for-larger-companies-or-at-least-dont-price-segment-on-resources/80233/1 "2025-02-21T19:52:08Z")

</div>

Glide’s **pricing model and resource limitations** make it well-suited for SMBs and non-mission-critical use cases, but it feels restrictive for larger organizations with more complex infrastructure needs.

Many enterprises already have resource configurations in place— **Postgres, Redis, MongoDB** , and other databases. However, Glide’s current approach **forces reliance on its own data layer** , limiting its ability to support apps that need to stitch together multiple dependencies.

For Glide to **scale beyond SMBs** , I think a more **robust resource & integration layer** is a must to gain buy on from these orgs. Instead of focusing primarily on Google Sheets and Airtable (which most engineers know aren’t scalable for serious workloads), Glide could:

• **Expand native support** for databases like Postgres, Redis, and enterprise-grade APIs.

• **Provide a more flexible data layer** , enabling direct connections instead of requiring data replication.

• **Improve scalability** , allowing apps to integrate seamlessly with existing infrastructure.

I’m really impressed with Glide’s **editor and feature set (particularly their implementation of UI)**—better than many competitors in some areas—but expanding its resource model would unlock **higher-value use cases and larger customers**

Would love to hear if this is something Glide is considering so we can build out some tools here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MaximeBaker](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/community.glideapps.com/maximebaker/32/80877_2.png) [@MaximeBaker](https://community.glideapps.com/u/MaximeBaker)
#### Post date: [February 21, 2025, 9:42pm UTC](https://community.glideapps.com/t/expand-glide-s-resource-integration-layer-for-larger-companies-or-at-least-dont-price-segment-on-resources/80233/2 "2025-02-21T21:42:34Z")

</div>

You need to vote on your own post.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![tools-dev](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex002/user_avatar/community.glideapps.com/tools-dev/32/85456_2.png) [@tools-dev](https://community.glideapps.com/u/tools-dev)
#### Post date: [February 21, 2025, 10:00pm UTC](https://community.glideapps.com/t/expand-glide-s-resource-integration-layer-for-larger-companies-or-at-least-dont-price-segment-on-resources/80233/3 "2025-02-21T22:00:10Z")

</div>

Thanks Max! I voted.
